National freecall: 1800 655 510    Student and Member Portal  

News Articles and Updates Archive

Home
2014
Archive for: February
Page 2

By Carl Sachs

The revised Australian Standard AS1657 for fixed ladders, platforms and walkways released in October 2013 plugs some serious holes. Guard rails made of rubber, for example, are now explicitly unacceptable.

While absurd, rubber guard rails technically complied with the 21-year-old AS1657 and the example shows just how sorely an update was needed.

Four big changes to AS1657

The biggest changes to AS1657 concern selection, labelling, guardrail testing and the design of fixed ladders.

Access selection
The new standard deals with the selection of access methods. It explains when to use different types of access, adopting a hierarchical approach consistent with the OHS legislation.

A new “Safe Ladder” appendix details how to be sure that ladders satisfy technical and ergonomic requirements for workplaces.

Fixed ladder design
The most significant set of changes to AS1657 concerns the design of fixed ladders. Over the 21 years since the standard was written, there has been an explosion in the sales of “cut to size” ladders, which led to several safety-related issues:

  • Rung spacing dimensions
  • Uneven rung heights at the base of ladders
  • Non-level landings
  • Fixings suitability to the structures
  • Unsuitable fitment of hand holds leading to potential safety hazards
  • Methods of mounting of cages and fixing to structures
  • Lack of suitable design criteria
  • Use of fall arrest systems

The revised AS1657 includes changes to design criteria, dimensions of rung spacing, mounting of cages, fixings to structures, inappropriate use of hand holds plus several other small issues.

The net result is a clearer and a safer set of requirements for users and manufacturers.  Additional costs to the industry are expected to be minor and will be offset by multiple benefits, including;

–        improved safety for users in terms of rung spacing, ladder strength and support fixings

–        increased rung design loadings that are now aligned with portable ladders

–        increased emphasis on the use of sloping ladders in the range of 60 to 75 degrees

–        provision for the use of complying fall arrest systems as an alternative means of fall protection

–        new ladder testing protocols as an alternative means of supplying compliant products

–        new provisions for single-stile ladders in specific applications.

Mandatory labelling
Identification assists building owners and asset owners to identify responsible parties and assist the workplace safety regulators with incident investigation and root cause analysis but was not mandatory under the old standard.

The revised standard mandates permanent product labelling to:

–        verify compliance of the installation with AS1657

–        identify the designer, fabricator, installer and certifier

–        provide for effective product recalls of faulty equipment

The labelling also allows manufacturers to deliver key information such as servicing requirements and special use instructions, will lift the accountability of suppliers, and assist with traceability and incident investigation.

Guardrail, ladder and staircase testing
The testing procedure contained in the old standard was seriously deficient for guardrail. In fact, a rubber guardrail would have passed because there were no deflection requirements.

The new standard, AS1657-2013, aligns with AS/NZS 1170.1 – 2002, requiring higher concentrated loads and line loads for guard railing systems. Importantly, it references standards to ensure the correct application of load factors and load combinations in the design and testing process.

New tests for ladders and staircases have been introduced to align with the testing regime for portable ladders.

Other changes
Updates to the standard also address the slip resistance of walkways and an alternative test method for stairways other than structural calculation. It is essential that there is a straightforward way of proving the performance of products because many of the items produced under AS1657 are manufactured by companies without the engineering resources to design by calculation.

In the case of mass-produced proprietary systems, the test method is used as an adjunct to design and is compulsory.

Step irons, too, are revisited. While they were covered by AS 1657-1992, additional provisions for sewerage applications were included in AS 4198-1994. EN 13101 is now extensively referenced.

A safer and easier to use standard for walkways, ladders and platforms
After 21 years, AS1657 was very outdated. This revision will provide increased certainty for manufacturers and specifiers of access equipment that can only lead to greater safety for users.

About the author:

Carl Sachs is the managing director of falls prevention specialist Workplace Access & Safety. He was a member of the committee responsible for the revision of  Australian Standard 1657: Fixed platforms, walkways, stairways and ladders – Design, construction and installation and represents the Facility Managers Association on standards committee AS1891 (Industrial fall-arrest devices). Carl’s business, Workplace Access & Safety, provides the full safety package for fall prevention – from risk assessments and system design through to installation, training, annual maintenance and certification.

The new anti-bullying jurisdiction has received 44 stop bullying applications in the first month of its operation.

Administered by the Fair Work Commission, the new anti-bullying laws started on 1 January.

Some applications have been dealt with already and six applications have been withdrawn. As required by the governing legislation, the commission says it commenced all matters within 14 days of receiving the applications.

The number of bullying applications per month may grow.

“January and February traditionally see a smaller number of lodgements with the Commission, particularly in relation to other individual-based rights disputes such as unfair dismissals and general protections,” said Commission President Justice Iain Ross.

“The time of year and the fact that this is a new jurisdiction means that the number of applications received to date is not necessarily indicative of the lodgement trends we will see in future.”

For more details, visit the commission’s anti-bullying website.

Published on 13 February 2014 in NSCA Safe-T-Bulletin.

The focus of safety responsibilities in the New Zealand Forest Operations Approved Code of Practice is under review.

“The current Code of Practice is more focused on the ‘worker on the hill’. We want to ensure management, owners and other parties in the contracting chain are absolutely clear about their responsibilities,” said the chair of WorkSafe New Zealand Professor Gregor Coster.

Forestry owners, managers and contractors must do more to protect the men and women on the bush line, Coster said.

In addition to WorkSafe’s inquiry, Coster and the WorkSafe NZ Chief Executive, General Managers and Chief Inspectors are meeting with owners and managers in the forestry sector.

“These face-to-face meetings build on the 164 inspections undertaken since August 2013 which have resulted in more than 200 enforcement actions, including 14 operations being shut down,” stated WorkSafe NZ.

For more details, visit WorkSafe.

Published on 13 February 2014 in NSCA Safe-T-Bulletin.

The finalists in the ninth Safe Work Australia Awards have been announced.

Thirty-seven finalists will compete for four awards on Monday 28 April, World Day for Safety and Health at Work.

The finalists are the winners of the 2013 state, territory and Comcare awards.

They will be competing in the following categories: Best Workplace Health and Safety Management System; Best Solution to an Identified Workplace Health and Safety Issue; Best Workplace Health and Safety Practice/s in a Small Business; and Best Individual Contribution to Workplace Health and Safety by an employee and a work health and safety manager.

“The level of innovation and commitment to work health and safety displayed by this year’s finalists is inspiring,” said Safe Work Australia chair Ann Sherry AO.

“The best outcomes are achieved when everyone in the workplace actively participates in making the workplace safe. These finalists prove that you can make a difference to your workplaces’ health and safety.”

For a list of the finalists, visit the finalists.

Published on 13 February 2014 in NSCA Safe-T-Bulletin.

Some safety managers have experienced significant drops in remuneration, while the pressure to do more with less has risen, says a recent survey.

Project and state-level workplace health and safety (WHS) managers in Western Australia have experienced a 20.8 per cent drop in their average total annual remuneration in the past year, says the safesearch survey.

Pay drops have also been evident in Queensland, where WHS Managers’ remuneration is 10.7 per cent less than last year.

However, the situation has been slightly different in New South Wales and Victoria, where WHS managers have seen their pay increase 0.9 per cent and 2.9 per cent respectively.

The same survey also found that “pressure to do more with less in safety is on the rise”. “Forty-three per cent of General Managers of Workplace Health & Safety (WHS) are responsible for more than 50 sites, up 6 per cent on 2012/13, while 53 per cent have more than 6 direct reports, also up 6 per cent from 2012/13.”

Safesearch surveyed more than 1000 WHS and health safety and environment individuals at 130 “predominantly” ASX 200 companies about their remuneration.

For more details, visit the safesearch survey.

Published on 13 February 2014 in NSCA Safe-T-Bulletin.


Safe-T-Bulletin

Safety and Training E-Bulletin is a free subscription service emailed fortnightly with news, training dates and NSCA updates.

 

© Fire and Safety Australia Pty Ltd


Connect with the NSCA on LinkedIn Subscribe to RSS feed

 

The name NSCA & other NSCA brands & logos are trademarks of Fire and Safety Australia Pty Ltd & are used under licence. The NSCA is a registered Training Organisation RTO No: 22250.